<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>It&#039;s all just spinning rust</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ianburnett.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ianburnett.com</link>
	<description>The rants and raves of a thirty-something</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:29:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter Bible</title>
		<link>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/08/25/twitter-bible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/08/25/twitter-bible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fun stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/08/25/twitter-bible/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may have heard of Twitter. You may have heard of the Bible. There are a few people who have put it together. To get you started in the very old and the very new: Twitter: a website which allows people to communicate thoughts. These thoughts are often trivial and/or egotistical in nature. These thoughts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may have heard of <a href="http://www.twitter.com" target="_blank">Twitter</a>. You may have heard of the Bible. There are a few people who have put it together. To get you started in the very old and the very new:</p>
<p>Twitter: a website which allows people to communicate thoughts. These thoughts are often trivial and/or egotistical in nature. These thoughts are also limited to 140 characters (due to the constraints of text messages), meaning that abbreviations such as BRB (be right back) and LOL (laugh out loud) are commonly required.</p>
<p>Bible: big book, written over the course of several hundred years from the dawn of time, detailing the universe’s history.</p>
<p>Put the two together and you end up with quite a fun summary of Genesis:</p>
<blockquote><p>Day 1: Lighting system installed. BRB. Days 2-6: Some assembly required: sky, plants, cows, people. Left humans in charge, LOL. Day 7: Siesta.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I did want to check some of this out before blogging about it, but Twitter seems to be permanently over capacity. There’s loads of people doing “cool” and “useful” stuff with Twitter (including IBM), but I can never be on the site long enough to find anything useful.</p>
<p>Update: finally got onto Twitter long enough to find the main Twitter page: <a href="http://twitter.com/WWGT" target="_blank">What Would God Tweet</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/08/25/twitter-bible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Information Age</title>
		<link>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/08/06/the-information-age/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/08/06/the-information-age/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 13:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramblings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/08/06/the-information-age/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever wondered why it’s called the information age? Well it’s because we’re now generating such vast quantities of electronic data every day. Eric Schmidt is the CEO of Google – a company that knows a thing or two about data. Speaking earlier this month, he stated: There was 5 exabytes of information created between the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever wondered why it’s called the information age?</p>
<p>Well it’s because we’re now generating such vast quantities of electronic data every day. Eric Schmidt is the CEO of Google – a company that knows a thing or two about data. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_ceo_schmidt_people_arent_ready_for_the_tech.php" target="_blank">Speaking earlier this month</a>, he stated:</p>
<blockquote><p>There was 5 exabytes of information created between the dawn of civilization through 2003, … but that much information is now created every 2 days, and the pace is increasing…</p>
</blockquote>
<p>For non-techies, 5 exabytes (5EB) probably means as much as “one-point-twenty-one-gigawatts” did in <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088763/" target="_blank">Back To The Future</a></em>, but take it from me that’s a lot. In <em>PC World</em> terms, 5 exabytes is 5,000,000,000 gigabytes. Average computers have hard disks around 500 gigabytes in size. And now we’re generating that <strong>every day</strong>.</p>
<p>That’s why it’s called the information age.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/08/06/the-information-age/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPod? iCan&#8217;t</title>
		<link>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/07/25/ipod-icant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/07/25/ipod-icant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 23:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ramblings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/07/25/ipod-icant/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nope – just tried again and I can’t justify buying an iPod. Let it be known, iPod Touch, that I was seriously looking in your direction, but still couldn’t convince myself that you were worth a quarter of a really good lens for my camera. For all they’re shiny, trendy and (according to the media) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope – just tried again and I can’t justify buying an iPod. Let it be known, iPod Touch, that I was seriously looking in your direction, but still couldn’t convince myself that you were worth a quarter of a really good lens for my camera.</p>
<p>For all they’re shiny, trendy and (according to the media) essential to ensure you have any friends at all, I just can’t see any point in me buying one. To me, the whole iPod ethos appears to be based around how much freedom the device gives you when you’re “on the move”. It therefore seems that my inability to purchase is essentially based on the following fact: if I am moving from one location to another, then 99.9% of the time, I’m driving. No public transport, no walking: just as sole captain of HMS Ian’s Honda. </p>
<p>My car is not iPod compatible, but has a sublime 8-speaker sound system with 6 CD auto-changer. All can be controlled without my fingertips leaving the steering wheel. So I don’t see any point in using one in the car.</p>
<p>When not driving, I live the majority of my life at home or work. At work, the scope for personal entertainment is minimal. I occasionally listen to music from my laptop, but that’s not too often. Anyway, I’m not buying an iPod just so I can listen to the occasional tune while working.</p>
<p>At home I have no requirement for hand-held entertainment. Music? Just pop the stereo on, which can stream any one of the tracks in the 16GB music collection instantly. Or go upstairs and work on the computer and do the same.</p>
<p>More expensive iPods allow you to watch movies. Whooop-a-dee-doo! Let’s peer at a tiny, highly-reflective screen for two hours while getting wrist cramp holding it upright for that long. If you remembered to make sure the battery was fully-charged. No thanks. Should the time arise when I can watch a full-length movie at home (and I believe the last time that happened was 2007), then I’ll do it lying on the sofa with a decent screen, sound, wine, and crisps.</p>
<p>Games? No thanks. I’ve got a GameCube sitting downstairs ready to go and I rarely get on that.</p>
<p>“Surfing the Internet”? Hmmm&#8230; With such a silly little screen, I’m thinking it’s going to be less like surfing and more like paddling while lying on a lolly stick. But! they all cry. You can zoom the screen just by swatting your fingers like this! And? Why should you have to? Besides, unless you go for the iPhone (or the monumentally expensive iPad), you can’t surf while out and about anyway. </p>
<p>And that’s another thing. What <strong>exactly</strong> do people use the Internet for when they’re out and about? Note that neither looking at a picture of your m8 and commenting “OMG!!!! LOL!!!!” on some social networking site, nor cheating with Wikipedia in a pub quiz, counts as real usage. The only real demo of mobile internet I’ve seen and thought “that’s clever” is of maps to get you from here to a given location. And possibly buying tickets online just before you arrive somewhere. Based on recent mobile Internet usage figures, there must be a hell of a lot of lost, ill-prepared people out there.</p>
<p>An iPod would replace my 2003-vintage HP iPaq 5550, which is now starting to show its age in terms of connectivity and compatibility. But at least it had a to-do list application available out of the box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/07/25/ipod-icant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scientists</title>
		<link>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/06/25/scientists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/06/25/scientists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fun stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/06/25/scientists/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a greats study of what 7th-grade kids in America thought about scientists both before and after a visit to Fermilab (a cutting-edge physics research facility in the US). Who’s the Scientist?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a greats study of what 7th-grade kids in America thought about scientists both before and after a visit to <a href="http://www.fnal.gov/" target="_blank">Fermilab</a> (a cutting-edge physics research facility in the US).</p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://ed.fnal.gov/projects/scientists/index.html" target="_blank">Who’s the Scientist?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/06/25/scientists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making an Impression</title>
		<link>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/06/12/making-an-impression/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/06/12/making-an-impression/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 23:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ramblings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/06/12/making-an-impression/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s late and I can’t sleep. Switched the telly on, to find there’s sod-all to watch. BBC 1 are currently broadcasting The National Lottery Friday Night Draws. Hosted by Ronni Ancona, it’s a pre-recorded 10 minute slot which essentially reads out the results of three lottery draws. None of these draws have more than seven [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s late and I can’t sleep.</p>
<p>Switched the telly on, to find there’s sod-all to watch. BBC 1 are currently broadcasting <em>The National Lottery Friday Night Draws</em>. Hosted by Ronni Ancona, it’s a pre-recorded 10 minute slot which essentially reads out the results of three lottery draws. None of these draws have more than seven balls pulled out of the magical spinning machine. That means they need to fill some time to pretend it’s worth a show in it’s own right and not just a voice over between real programmes. Fortunately the guest presenter is the aforementioned impressionist, so naturally, she needs to do an impression to provide some light entertainment.</p>
<p><strong>But why?</strong></p>
<p>Why do we need to suffer a badly-contrived pun joke, told in the style of Lorraine Kelly just for the sake of some filler to a show which shouldn’t exist in the first place? It <strong>isn’t </strong>a natural conclusion that if the presenter is an impressionist, then we should be dealt some crap which didn’t make it into their own sketch show.</p>
<p>I find this rings true for impressionists in general who appear on TV outside of their own take-it-or-leave-it type of entertainment. Take Rory Bremner for example. Every interview I’ve ever watched or listened to has consisted of a collection of tall stories manipulated to fit around his repertoire. Plus the one about John Major. Nothing insightful about the man himself, just the live version of a demo tape (and that includes a couple of interviews with Sir Michael of the Parkinson). Even non-chat shows, such as <em>Have I Got News For You</em> usually ends up with one or two impressionists per series and it’s the same story.</p>
<p>Why do they do it? No other profession appears to come on TV and be mandated to show their day job. I can’t imagine Lewis Hamilton sitting alongside Parky in his “works vehicle”, blipping the throttle every now and again. Give it a rest: just <strong>make </strong>an impression; don’t do one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/06/12/making-an-impression/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Motivational Seminars</title>
		<link>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/04/27/motivational-seminars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/04/27/motivational-seminars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ramblings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motivation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seminar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/04/27/motivational-seminars/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why would anyone ever be bothered to go to one?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would anyone ever be bothered to go to one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/04/27/motivational-seminars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weighty Issues</title>
		<link>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/04/26/weighty-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/04/26/weighty-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 07:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ramblings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaflet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slimming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/04/26/weighty-issues/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There’s an election on, in case you hadn’t noticed. Politicians are fighting for their seats like 5-year-olds in a game of musical chairs. Except you believe the children, and they’re less boring to watch. The real weighty issue, however, is not which way the vote will go in May, but more the heart-warming case of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There’s an election on, in case you hadn’t noticed. Politicians are fighting for their seats like 5-year-olds in a game of musical chairs. Except you believe the children, and they’re less boring to watch.</p>
<p>The real weighty issue, however, is not which way the vote will go in May, but more the heart-warming case of “Jane” who has rediscovered life now she’s a bit thinner thanks to <em>Slimming World</em>.</p>
<p>We got a flyer through our door yesterday with her wonderful story, advertising the fact that you too can lose some weight if you join this club. What first drew me in was the headline on the front of the leaflet:</p>
<blockquote><p>because of Slimming World, life’s never been so good!</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This is above a picture of a happy mother throwing her toddler in the air. Really? Wedding day? Birth of first child? Neither of these rank above losing a bit weight? Anyway, inside, the marketing continues with a small caption above her picture:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Jane Milner</strong>, 34, from Halifax, lost 2st 9lbs with Slimming World after the birth of baby Caitlin.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Now there’s two things wrong with that snippet. Firstly, why are they always from bloody Halifax? Every competition winner or true-life story that gets bandied about always contains somebody hailing from Halifax. What is it about that town? Looking at this woman I find it hard to picture her pottering around a village in West Yorkshire and calling everyone “duck”. Are you really from there or is that a fib because it sounds more appealing to the fat commoners than your real home in Henley-on-Thames?</p>
<p>Secondly, judging by the baby in the photo, I think she lost 37lbs <strong>because</strong> she gave birth to baby Caitlin, not after. The poor thing has obviously inherited the chunky gene from her mother. I’m saying Caitlin is a “her” though, only because I thought that was a girl’s name. The picture, however, shows a very boyish little thing with pudding-basin haircut and all dressed in blue, so I’m not sure.</p>
<p>As you’d expect, they’ve also got the obligatory “before” and “after” photos of this slim-line woman. Being honest, I prefer her before the weight loss. She wasn’t one of these 30st bag of spuds with a waist measured in yards – actually quite pretty and not exactly looking like she needed to lose weight in the first place. The “after” picture is obviously well done on a professional photo-shoot, where everything is arranged to be just perfect. Working upwards, the shoes have high heels and are covered completely by the mega-long boot-cut jeans to accentuate the legs. She’s turned towards the camera at enough of an angle to show she’s still got a bum, but now it’s nice and trim (I should really point out that even my arse looks trim from the front). She’s got her back arched to continue the eye-line and is holding the child across her front to cover any residual tummy that even a liquid-only diet can’t shift.</p>
<p>Not bad so far, but then things go really wrong. I don’t know whether it’s make-up or what, but it looks like she’s had a face-lift that would make even Anne Robinson think “ooh &#8211; that’s a bit much”. Plus, because of the contorted angle, it looks like she’s got some wrinkles round her neck that makes me think that “aged 34” is a reversal of the digits.</p>
<p>As with all of these things, if you’re paying £14.95 a week (according to the small print on the back) you want advice that’s more than simply “more exercise, fewer Mars Bars”. Helpfully, they’re on-hand with the pseudo-science as demonstrated in the bigger quote from happy Jane:</p>
<blockquote><p>“I love Food Optimising, because I can eat …”</p>
</blockquote>
<p><em>Food Optimising?</em> Note the preservation of the Capital Letters to show how Important and Clever this science is. There’s a quick list of her favourite daily menu, just to show the world she isn’t rationed to one rabbit-leaf per meal. I find breakfast particularly hard to swallow, both physically and metaphorically:</p>
<p>Breakfast is a bacon and egg sandwich and a big bowl of fruit salad. Now look &#8211; our views on what is classed as a bacon and egg sandwich are obviously polar opposites. The picture I’ve got in my head is by no means anywhere near close to staying underneath the guideline amounts of fat intake. For the week.</p>
<p>All this thinking about food has made me hungry. Now where’s that gateaux?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/04/26/weighty-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Courtesy Cars</title>
		<link>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/04/12/courtesy-cars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/04/12/courtesy-cars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ramblings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accord]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chevrolet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daewoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[honda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petrol]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/04/12/courtesy-cars/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love my car. It’s now official. In the space of a couple of months I’ve had two courtesy cars and was impressed with neither. Stepping back into my Accord this afternoon was just heaven. It all started back in March when I needed a replacement clutch, but it couldn’t be completed within the day. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love my car. It’s now official.</p>
<p>In the space of a couple of months I’ve had two courtesy cars and was impressed with neither. Stepping back into my Accord this afternoon was just heaven.</p>
<p>It all started back in March when I needed a replacement clutch, but it couldn’t be completed within the day. I therefore ended up with a courtesy car of a Honda Civc saloon. Now I’d already driven the new, angular Civic hatch and was less than impressed. Rear visibilty was poor, the diesel engine felt leaden, and the dash was starting to date horribly already. The engine was a real sore point, given that the same unit shoves my Accord along very happily, despite weighing about quarter of a ton more.</p>
<p>So I got this Honda Civic, but it was the saloon <em>Hybrid drive system</em>. This means an automatic gearbox (actually CVT) coupled with an electric motor and a little petrol engine. Normal gentle town driving uses the electric motor, heavier stuff brings the fossil fuels online.</p>
<p>Driving it was just weird. The first oddity was the fact that the engine switches off if you’re sitting at a junction with your foot on the brake (no clutch remember). That’s odd if you’re not used to it. Especially as there’s a definite jolt runs through the transmission when the engine does fire back up.</p>
<p>The main beef was the CVT gearbox, whose only purpose appeared to be to disconnect the engine completely from the wheels. Plant your foot at 60 and the engine just whined loudly with no extra progress being made. Nudge it along gently in traffic and the addition of the electric motor made it feel like it was permanently stalling. There was a rev counter, but I’ve no idea what that was supposed to be there for.</p>
<p>The Honda Civic was at least well-made, though. My next foray into guest vehicles was the devastatingly cheap Chevrolet Matiz (originally the Daewoo).</p>
<p>This is engineering on a severe budget. The model I received was the “deluxe” 1.0 SE version. This produces 64 bhp and 67 lb ft of torque. Put it another way: that’s around half the power and a quarter of the torque of my normal motor. Inside there are little in the way of creature comforts. Air con, electric front windows, and electric passenger mirror are about the limit of things. You can’t adjust the steering wheel in any direction. The driver’s side wing mirror is adjusted with a wiggly stick thing. Seats are a fully-manual affair.</p>
<p>But I really do get that. It’s all down to money and weight. I paid a reasonable sum of money for my car and got some nice options. I wasn’t disappointed, however, to find that my Accord didn’t have the gadget-list of a £100k Mercedes S-Class. In the same vein, I shouldn’t be disappointed with the Matiz when I’m missing a couple of motors for the chronically lazy.</p>
<p>Same with weight. Lighter means easier to move with a smaller engine. Smaller engine means cheaper and more fuel efficient. But that’s not my problem with the car. It’s aimed at being cheap, basic transport. No-one who buys this car will be under any impression that it is anything else. For cheap transport you expect thin, low quality plastics and very few trimmings.</p>
<p>My main problem is that nothing inside makes sense positioning-wise. For example, I’m just over 6ft. and obviously the seat needed to be right the way back. To operate the handbrake, I needed to move my arm so far back that my elbow poked past the seat backs. Now if you’re a 5ft 4in granny who drives with her nose on the windscreen, then I have absolutely no idea how she is to reach back that far.</p>
<p>To make things easier to transition between left- and right-hand drive versions, the speedo, rev counter, and fuel guage are all in the centre console at the top of the dash. Fair enough. But how much more money would it have been to make two versions of the mounting plastic – one which points it to a LH drive and one which points to a RH drive? As a result, the Transit which is currently up your arse on the M3 can read your speed more clearly than the driver.</p>
<p>The heater and vent controls are again, very basic. But why put them effectively on the floor, when there’s plenty space higher up the dash? I was reaching downwards to turn the heater down. And you can’t see the air-con button either because of your knee.</p>
<p>Just above the pedals is a small shelf designed to store something. No idea what, because it’s too small to be practical and secondly you’re going to die anyway. To drive this thing, you need to hook your feet underneath this shelf to get to the pedals. Thankfully I didn’t need to stop quickly, because I might not have got my feet out of the way fast enough.</p>
<p>And why could they not have got a clutch which was adjusted correctly? Only the top 3/4” of pedal travel provided the bite – after that the clutch was simply “off”. </p>
<p>Awful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/04/12/courtesy-cars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Slippery Out There You Know</title>
		<link>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/04/04/its-slippery-out-there-you-know/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/04/04/its-slippery-out-there-you-know/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 23:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ramblings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bronze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rubbish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/04/04/its-slippery-out-there-you-know/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Switching on the TV today to check footy scores meant I landed on the “World Figure-Skating Championships”, broadcast by the BBC and a rapidly-ageing Sue Barker. While I was still looking in a stunned fashion at Teletext announcing the Sunderland 3 Spurs 1 result, our friend Sue introduced some dancing by a pair whose names [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Switching on the TV today to check footy scores meant I landed on the “World Figure-Skating Championships”, broadcast by the BBC and a rapidly-ageing Sue Barker.</p>
<p>While I was still looking in a stunned fashion at Teletext announcing the Sunderland 3 Spurs 1 result, our friend Sue introduced some dancing by a pair whose names I can’t remember, pronounce, or spell. The commentary over the brief highlights of synchronised slippage went something like this:</p>
<blockquote><p>And next we had blah blah and blah blah of Russia who last year blah, blah, blah, blah in all competitions. This time they failed to manage the chuck* again and that slip cost them points. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>* Note “the chuck” probably isn’t the technical term, but it’s the bit where the bloke throws the woman in the air and she lands gracefully. This time, the woman didn’t exactly land gracefully. She fell on her arse and slithered across the ice, before jumping up because it was too cold through her sparkly lycra. The commentary continued:</p>
<blockquote><p>As a result, they ended up with the bronze medal.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Regardless of the proper name, how can you fall over and yet <strong>still</strong> come third? Or put it another way: 22 other couples were placed below them in the final ranking – how bad must they have been?</p>
<p>One of the other strange things which I noticed was that when the woman fell over, the crowd still gave a round of applause. Maybe another sign of the dross which had proceeded it.</p>
<p>Not for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/04/04/its-slippery-out-there-you-know/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spam Nuggets</title>
		<link>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/03/28/spam-nuggets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/03/28/spam-nuggets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 22:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ramblings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[akismet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/03/28/spam-nuggets/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone who has been using the internet for longer than about 45 minutes will have noticed the problem of spam. “Spam” was originally used as a term to describe unsolicited e-mails, often advertising porn or under-the-counter pharmacology. On the modern internet, there’s also the problem of spam comments. When running a website like the one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who has been using the internet for longer than about 45 minutes will have noticed the problem of spam. “Spam” was originally used as a term to describe unsolicited e-mails, often advertising porn or under-the-counter pharmacology. On the modern internet, there’s also the problem of spam comments.</p>
<p>When running a website like the one you’re looking at now, there’s the option of reader interaction. Readers can post comments and start a discussion about whatever drivel I’ve written that day. You normally also need to fill in some additional information, such as your e-mail address and an optional website. What happens is that “people” (and that’s more often than not, just an automated computer program) attempt to put comments on my blog that are irrelevant to the actual post in an attempt to advertise whatever illegal or pornographic wares they’re touting.</p>
<p>Handily, there’s a system to detect such spam comments and filter them out before they reach the unwitting reader of my blog, and it’s called <a href="http://akismet.com/" target="_blank">Akismet</a>. Basically, before any comment appears on my website, it goes via someone else who gives the thumbs-up or thumbs-down as to whether this is a genuine comment or a computer programmer trying to offload some Viagra. To give you an idea of how prevalent comment spam is, the Akismet website claims approximately 83% of all comments posted to blogs and the like, are spam.</p>
<p>As part of the weekly running of my website, I regularly review comments that have been marked as spam and delete them. Sometimes the spam text is a fairly simple message shouting “Get Your Viagra Here”, along with a website to visit. Other times, it’s fairly subtle. An example is a genuine-sounding comment along the lines of “I like your article and will read your blog often”. The hook comes with their (automatically linked) website being the porn &amp; pills page. There’s also a category of posts that put together very long paragraphs (several hundred words), but almost completely randomly. To non-programmers, it’s surprising to find out that it’s very hard to distinguish between several paragraphs of random words and some prose written by a normal person. Bit like my blog really, but that’s beside the point.</p>
<p>Normally I just delete these unwanted spam comments, but some of the comment texts are genuinely funny. I’ve included a list of my favourites below (note some website links have been removed to avoid giving them a free ride):</p>
<blockquote><p>When you order frogs legs at a restaurant what do they do with the rest of the frog ? – Well surely they just throw the rest of the frog away and take it to the tip.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This question genuinely intrigues me. I doubt the French really do waste large amounts of amphibian, but struggle to think of a time when I’ve heard of “frog-back soup”.</p>
<blockquote><p>I am completely impressed with the article I have just read. I wish the writer of <a href="http://www.ianburnett.com">http://www.ianburnett.com</a> can continue to provide so much useful information and unforgettable experience to <a href="http://www.ianburnett.com">http://www.ianburnett.com</a> readers. There is not much to say except the following universal truth: Progress cannot be achieved without suffering. I will be back.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Flattering, deep, and The Terminator all rolled into one.</p>
<blockquote><p>Although the dog was dog shoes particularly associated dog shoes with The Shoe it is also recorded that it made appearances througout the parish of North Wraxall. The dog shoes village of Ford has a parish journal from April, 1794 that claims the dog was heard outdoor the vicarage immediately in the past the ruin of Richard Wooley, the vicar. http://www.&lt;websitedeleted&gt;.com</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I’ll just have a half of whatever he was on.</p>
<blockquote><p>Wow, ya got me… im going into the members area now !</p>
</blockquote>
<p>What members area?</p>
<blockquote><p>How much money has passed thru your hands in a lifetime?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I probably don’t want to think about that, because I’ve got bugger-all left now.</p>
<blockquote><p>I would appreciate more visual materials, to make your blog more attractive, but your writing style really compensates it. But there is always place for improvement</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Everyone’s a critic &#8211; even the spammers!</p>
<blockquote><p>Just the FA Cup Semi to concentrate on now. 4th Place is out of the question.</p>
<p>Martin you [n]eed to sort out the awful display after this weekend. Too many tired wasters.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Oddly these two football-related comments were on an article completely unrelated to sport.</p>
<p>I’ll leave you, however, with a comment which was received yesterday and sums things up nicely:</p>
<blockquote><p>I truly enjoy your site… Even the spammers are quite entertaining.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Damn right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ianburnett.com/2010/03/28/spam-nuggets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
